“We aren’t all owed the right to every ability, every experience, or every honor that comes with them.”
Modern gender ideology often treats identity as something that can exist without definition. But if an identity has no definition: no boundaries, distinctions, or limitations; what does it actually mean?
That problem reaches beyond the debate over sex and gender. It also helps explain one of the Catholic Church’s most controversial teachings: why the priesthood is reserved to men.
In this video, I argue that equality of dignity does not imply interchangeability of roles. Men and women are distinct, created realities, and distinctions necessarily entail limitations. Christ himself chose only men for apostolic ministry, not because women were less holy or less valuable.
I also consider the arguments from equality and justice, the relationship between priesthood and sacrifice, Christ’s imagery of the shepherd, and why accepting the limits of one’s vocation may actually be an essential part of Christian humility.
Timestamps
0:00 Identity without definition
0:48 Identity necessarily involves limits
1:41 Supporting the channel
2:36 Sex, difference, and created nature
3:58 General claims vs. exceptional cases
5:10 Different natures mean different capacities
5:58 Why this matters for ordination
6:37 Holiness does not equal priestly vocation
7:40 Is excluding women from priesthood unjust?
8:21 Equality, pluralism, and the struggle for power
9:52 Celibacy, sacrifice, and authority
11:28 Why Jesus uses the image of the shepherd
12:43 Masculinity, sacrifice, and protecting others
14:35 Vocation, limitations, and humility
